‘Impossible fossils’ puncture evolution


The Alvis Delk Cretaceous Footprint

A handprint, a finger, a footprint and a hammer are part of a smattering of “impossible fossils” – so called because they upend the evolutionary timetable and puncture the theory of evolution.

A handprint in limestone from the Cretaceous Era – 110 million years ago – was found near Weatherford, Texas, in the 1970s. It is on display at the Creation Evidence Museum in Glen Rose, Texas. Either human-like creatures were on earth much earlier than thought, or the dating methods are flawed and the earth is much younger than most scientists will admit.


From the Cretaceous Era by dating methods — long before man was believed to be alive.

A fossilized human finger also from the Cretaceous Era was found also in the 1970s in the Commanche Peak Limestone formation in Texas and is on display at the Creation Evidence Museum. The fact that flesh has been fossilized (normally only bones make it through millennia as fossils) could result from instant entombment in mud (from a huge flood, for example).


The London hammer

A footprint – known as the Burdick Track – was found again in Cretaceous limestone in the Cross Branch stratum, a tributary to the Paluxy River in Glen Rose, Texas.

Staunch evolutionists have worked vigorously to poke holes in the credibility of these discoveries – with good reason, because they poke holes in the theory of evolution. The extent to which they defend a pet theory in spite of discrediting discoveries reveals a lack of scientific integrity, many believe.


Ken Ham debates Bill Nye the Science Guy about evolution in 2014

“These amazing fossilized imprints/remains have left the scientific community scratching their heads,” said Mihai Andrei on ZME Science, himself no creationist.

Another footprint – called the Alvis Delk Cretaceous Footprint – is even more intriguing because it is intersected by the footprint of an Acrocanthosaurus dinosaur print. This suggests that dinosaurs and man walked the Earth at the same time. The infrequency of such intersections in fossils makes sense: humans tried to stay away from the fearsome animals. Read the rest of the fascinating story.

7 responses to “‘Impossible fossils’ puncture evolution

  1. The story is shoddy work at best. It only takes a quick search to find out that that the hammer is from the 1800s and the conditions in the area that caused it. There hasn’t been anything to show that the “finger” is really a fossilized human finger either. I’m not evolutionist, but articles like this do creationism no service.

  2. VERY GOOD stuff here! And there’s a whole bunch more out there. I’m so glad you are spending some of your space on this. The evolutionists keep ramming this down society’s throat, ignoring and even burying evidence against evolution. I did a 3 part series on Giants you might enjoy. I think Gigantopithecus was actually a giant. Several giant skeletons were found in Ohio in the 1800’s and “lost” by the Smithsonian. Search for “A Tradition of Giants and Ancient North American Warfare.” Here’s a link to a fascinating lecture on stone structures in New England and a conclusion that they reflect activity of the giants that were here: Mysterious Stone Chambers & Giants Discovered in New England, A Lecture by Jim Vieira, stone mason and researcher. Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-4sI34aIZ0

    If you have more on this, I’d really like to see more from you on what you have found!

  3. I’ve read about the fossilized finger in another news article recently. X-rays revealed internal structures, indicating this is not someone’s hoax, but the real deal. While the hammer is obviously not millions of years old, it points to two facts that can cast doubt on the deep time theories – 1) You don’t need millions of years for stone layers to form. 2) If the host rock tested Cretaceous, then it shows the unreliability of dating. Carbon dating is no good past 100,000 years, if I recall correctly. Anyone can take the half-life of that Carbon isotope and do the math for themselves.

    Other radioactive isotopes used for testing all make assumptions that cannot be verified. So, while the math might be good, the starting place causes false results.

  4. Reblogged this on RG's 2 Cents and commented:
    Amazing! Not only this find, but the attempts at covering it up. One must wonder at the motives of the scientific community…

  5. Bill Nye the Science Guy does not look very happy. I would have liked to hear that debate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s